As the election countdown approaches 33 days, the campaign season is in full swing, evident by the proliferation of campaign signs along our roadways. However, there are strict guidelines to follow when it comes to the placement of these signs, with potential legal consequences for non-compliance.
Among the regulations to adhere to, it is crucial not to obstruct another candidate’s sign with one’s own. An incident captured by WWAY on Third Street exemplified this issue. While signs are permissible adjacent to state-owned roads, they are prohibited in high-speed zones like I-40. Additionally, it is essential to note that only the individual who installed a campaign sign has the authority to remove it. Any defacing or tampering with these signs is unlawful.
According to Jessi Leonard of the NCDOT, campaign signs are permitted from September 17 to November 15, provided they do not pose safety hazards. Concerns primarily revolve around obstructing sight distance and avoiding attachment to existing DOT equipment within the right of way.
Following a recent altercation involving campaign signs, statements were obtained from both Tim Merrick and Natosha Tew. Merrick expressed his disappointment in Tew’s alleged disregard for regulations, recounting past incidents he perceived as rule violations. In response, Tew emphasized ethical conduct in campaigning and disavowed any support for election manipulation.
These developments underscore the importance of upholding legal and ethical standards in campaign activities, especially as the election draws near.
