Washington, D.C. – In what may be the final debate of the 2024 presidential campaign, vice presidential candidates Tim Walz and JD Vance turned their criticism toward the top of their respective tickets, engaging in a policy-oriented discussion. The encounter between Minnesota’s Democratic governor and Ohio’s Republican senator followed the previous debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. With Election Day just five weeks away and early voting underway, the stakes of the contest have been raised even further due to recent events, including Iran’s missile attack on Israel, a devastating hurricane, and a potential port strike. Throughout the debate, Walz and Vance highlighted the policy and character differences between their running mates, aiming to introduce themselves to the nation. Here are key takeaways from the debate:
1. Foreign Policy Contrasts: The missile attack prompted a contrast in foreign policy approaches. Walz emphasized “steady leadership” under Harris, while Vance pledged a return to “peace through strength” if Trump were re-elected.
2. Focus on Running Mates: Both candidates directed the bulk of their attacks at the running mates who weren’t present. They sought to convey geniality while criticizing Harris and Trump, recognizing that most voters base their decisions on the presidential candidate.
3. Immigration and Abortion: Walz criticized Trump’s failure to deliver on his promise of a border wall and discussed abortion access, emphasizing the need to respect women’s decisions. Vance claimed that GOP proposals would economically empower women, thereby reducing the demand for abortions.
4. Substance Over Style: The debate veered away from the typical style of presidential debates, with both candidates diving into policy minutiae. They discussed healthcare, energy policy, trade, and climate change, highlighting their different approaches.
5. Failure to Address Direct Questions: Neither candidate directly answered some of the moderator’s questions. Walz avoided commenting on a preemptive strike by Israel against Iran, while Vance sidestepped inquiries about Trump’s claims of election fraud.
Despite verbal stumbles from Walz, particularly on foreign policy, and their attempts to maintain cordiality throughout the debate, the candidates engaged in sharp exchanges over abortion and the legitimacy of the 2020 election. As the campaign intensifies, voters face a clear choice between honoring democracy or aligning with Donald Trump’s legacy.
Note: The reworded version of the article has been condensed to fit the given word count.
